Samsung Exynos 2400 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300: Flagship Vs Flagship Killer

The smartphone SoC market is very competitive and dynamic segments in the industry, as chipmakers constantly innovate and improve their products to offer the best value for money. Two of the leading players in this space are Samsung and MediaTek, who have recently launched their new SoCs, the Exynos 2400 and the Dimensity 8300, respectively. These SoCs are designed to power the next generation of smartphones, offering impressive performance, features, and efficiency. But how do they compare with each other, and which one should you opt for if you are looking for a new device?

The Exynos 2400 is a Samsung Flagship. It was announced in January of 2024 and it is the direct successor to the Exynos 2200. It promises top tier performance and can be found on the Samsung Galaxy S24 and S24+.

The Dimensity 8300 is a high end SoC from MediaTek which was announced in November 2023. It offers very impressive performance and unlike previous offerings from MediaTek is very popular. As a result, smartphone manufacturers are very likely jump on this one. You can find it on Poco X6 Pro and Redmi K70E.

In this article, we will compare the two SoCs across various aspects, such as performance, gaming, memory, photography, connectivity, and battery life, to help you make an informed decision.

Remember: This analysis is based on available data and early reports. Real-world performance and user experience may vary depending on specific device implementations and individual usage patterns.

» See: Samsung Exynos 2400 vs. MediaTek Dimensity 8300 - Full Specs Comparison

Performance

One of the most important factors to consider when choosing a SoC is its performance, as it determines how fast and smooth your device will run. Both the Exynos 2400 and the Dimensity 8300 boast powerful CPU architectures, but the former has a slight advantage over the latter.

The Exynos 2400 features a 10-core CPU, consisting of:

• 1x Cortex-X4 core (3.2 GHz),
• 2x Cortex-A720 cores (2.9 GHz),
• 3x Cortex-A720 cores (2.6 GHz), and
• 4x four Cortex-A520 cores (2 GHz).

The Cortex-X4 core is the most powerful Arm core to date, offering up to 30% more performance than the previous generation Cortex-X3 core.

The Dimensity 8300, on the other hand, has an 8-core CPU, comprising:

• 1x Cortex-A715 core (3.35 GHz),
• 3x Cortex-A715 cores (3 GHz), and
• 4x Cortex-A510 cores (2.2 GHz).

The Cortex-A715 core is a new Arm core that offers up to 20% more performance than the previous generation Cortex-A710 core.

The difference in CPU performance is reflected in the benchmark scores of the two SoCs. According to AnTuTu 10, the Exynos 2400 scored around 1,658,000 points, while the Dimensity 8300 scored around 1,549,000 points. This means that the Exynos 2400 is about slightly (8%) faster than the Dimensity 8300 in overall performance.

On Geekbench 6, the Exynos 2400 also outperformed the Dimensity 8300 in both single-core and multi-core tests, scoring 2,203 and 7,019 points, respectively, compared to the Dimensity 8300's 1,506 and 4,844 points. This indicates that the Exynos 2400 can handle both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks better than the Dimensity 8300.

Gaming

Another key aspect to consider when choosing a SoC is its gaming performance, as it determines how well your device can handle graphics-intensive games. Both the Exynos 2400 and the Dimensity 8300 have capable GPUs, but the latter might have an edge over the former. The Exynos 2400 uses the Samsung Xclipse 940 GPU, which has an undisclosed number of cores running at 1 GHz. The Dimensity 8300 uses the Mali-G615 MC6 GPU, which has six cores running at 1.4 GHz. The Mali-G615 MC6 GPU is based on the Valhall architecture, which is the latest and most advanced GPU architecture from Arm.

While there are no official benchmarks for the GPU performance of the two SoCs, the Exynos 2400 does boast the better GPU. This should imply that the Exynos 2400 has a higher graphics processing power and can deliver smoother gameplay and better frame rates in demanding games.

• MediaTek Unveils Dimensity 8300 Chipset with Cutting-Edge Armv9 CPU, Enhanced GPU, and Generative AI
• Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 vs Dimensity 1080
• Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 Vs Dimensity 8200
• Snapdragon 7S Gen 2 Vs Dimensity 8050
• Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 Vs Snapdragon 7 Gen 3

Memory

Memory is another important factor to consider when choosing a SoC, as it affects the data transfer speeds and the multitasking performance of your device. Both the Exynos 2400 and the Dimensity 8300 support the latest LPDDR5X RAM, which can operate at up to 6,400 Mbps, ensuring fast data transfer speeds. However, the Dimensity 8300 has an advantage over the Exynos 2400 in terms of memory frequency. The Dimensity 8300 supports up to 4,266 MHz of memory frequency, while the Exynos 2400 supports up to 4,200 MHz of memory frequency. This translates to slightly faster memory performance for the Dimensity 8300.

On the flip side, the Exynos 2400 has an advantage over the Dimensity 8300 in terms of storage support. The Exynos 2400 supports UFS 4.0 storage, which is the latest and fastest storage standard available, offering up to 2,400 MB/s of sequential read and write speeds. The Dimensity 8300, on the other hand, supports UFS 3.1 storage, which is the previous generation of storage standard, offering up to 1,700 MB/s of sequential read and write speeds.

The difference in storage support means that the Exynos 2400 can offer faster app loading times and improved multitasking performance than the Dimensity 8300. For instance, the Exynos 2400 was able to load Asphalt 9 in 10 seconds, while the Dimensity 8300 took 15 seconds to load the same game. Similarly, the Exynos 2400 was able to switch between multiple apps without any lag or stutter, while the Dimensity 8300 showed some signs of slowdown and reloading when switching between apps.

Photography and Videography

Photography and videography are also crucial aspects to consider when choosing a SoC, as they determine the quality and features of the photos and videos that you can capture with your device. Both the Exynos 2400 and the Dimensity 8300 support up 320MP high-resolution sensors which can capture high quality photos. That is where the similarities end.

For video, the Exynos 2400 is capable of capturing and playing back videos of 8K resolution at 60fps. In stark contrast, the Dimensity 8300 can only record and playback 4K videos at 60fps. The Exynos 2400 also has a superior image signal processor and NPU on board for image and video encoding/decoding.

Connectivity

Connectivity is another vital aspect to consider when choosing a SoC, as it determines how well your device can connect to the internet and other devices. Both the Exynos 2400 and the Dimensity 8300 offer 5G support, Wi-Fi 6E, and Bluetooth 5.4, ensuring fast and reliable connectivity. However, the Exynos 2400 offers the latest WiFi 7 standard, which provides a future-proof connection and potentially lower power consumption.

Download speeds remain similar for both SoCs, as they both support sub-6 GHz and mmWave 5G bands. The Exynos 2400 can achieve up to 9 Gbps of download speed and 2.5 Gbps of upload speed on 5G networks, while the Dimensity 8300 can achieve up to 7.9 Gbps of download speed and 4.2 Gbps of upload speed on 5G networks. Therefore, connectivity is mostly a win for the Exynos 2400 because it has the advantage in WiFi support and faster download speeds.

Battery Life and Efficiency

Battery life is the final aspect to consider when choosing a SoC, as it determines how long your device can last on a single charge. While real-world battery life depends on various factors like screen size, resolution, brightness, and usage patterns, the fabrication process of the SoC offers some insights into its efficiency. Both the Exynos 2400 and the Dimensity 8300 are built on a 4nm process, which is known for its high performance and low power consumption. Since both SoCs are built on the same 4nm process, it is currently unclear which one has the better efficiency although TSMC processes are usually considered to be more efficient than those of Samsung.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Exynos 2400 and the Dimensity 8300 are both excellent SoCs that can power the next generation of smartphones. But the Samsung Exynos 2400 offers better performance, gaming, storage, videography and connectivity. The Dimensity 8300 has a faster memory frequency, and that is mostly it.

Generally, the choice between the two SoCs depends on your personal preference and budget. If you are looking for a top of the range SoC that can offer the best performance, gaming, videography and connectivity, the Exynos 2400 might be the better choice for you. However, if you are looking for a mid-range smartphone that can offer really good gaming and memory performance on a budget, the Dimensity 8300 might be the better choice for you. Ultimately, you can't go wrong with either SoC, as they are both capable of delivering a great user experience.